![]() The anticipated population explosion is morphing into something more like an implosion, with much of the world now facing population stagnation, and even contraction. These predictions turned out to be vastly exaggerated, with a rapid decline in global hunger. Similar conclusions were drawn four years later in the corporate-sponsored Club of Rome report, which embraced an agenda of austerity and retrenchment to stave off population-driven mass starvation and social chaos. It’s been a half century since Stanford biologist Paul Ehrlich’s Population Bomb (1968) prophesied a surge of population that would foster Malthusian mass starvation, which echoed the premise of lurid book called Famine 1975! Ehrlich and his acolytes urged extreme measures to stave off disaster, including adding sterilant into the water supply. Marriage rates have dropped significantly to 35 year lows. Brookings predicts that COVID will result in 300,000 to 500,000 fewer U.S. The ongoing pandemic appears to be driving birth rates globally down even further, and the longer it lasts, the greater possibility that familial implosion will get far worse, and perhaps intractable. Even before the Covid-19 pandemic, family formation and birth rates were declining throughout much of the world, not just in most of the West and East Asia, but also in parts of South American and the Middle East. Margaret Mead once said, “no matter how many communes anyone invents, the family always creeps back.” But today’s trajectory is not promising. Yet, judges now follow a variant of Jacobson that is far removed from the Lochner era decision.” It upheld the state’s power to impose a nominal fine on an unvaccinated person. But Justice John Marshall Harlan’s decision was very narrow. Courts relied on this 1905 precedent to resolve disputes about religious freedom, abortion, gun rights, voting rights, the right to travel, and many other contexts. Massachusetts became the fountainhead for pandemic jurisprudence. “During the COVID-19 outbreak, Jacobson v. Plus: The Irrepressible Myth of Jacobson v. UPDATE (FROM GLENN): The Horrific Outcomes of the Jacobson Case You’re Using to Justify Biden’s Vaccine Mandates. Three generations of imbeciles are enough. The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes. As one of America’s most famous jurists once pointed out, The idea that such rules could set a dangerous precedent is simply paranoid. Indeed, vaccine mandates might even improve your liberty. Massachusetts that vaccine mandates are constitutional. The Supreme Court said more than a hundred years ago in Jacobson v. RELAX ABOUT THE PUSH FOR VACCINE MANDATES.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |